Contracts and Inequity Aversion
نویسندگان
چکیده
Inequity aversion is a special form of other regarding preferences and captures many features of reciprocal behavior, an apparently robust pattern in human nature. Using this concept we analyze the Moral Hazard problem and derive several results which differ from conventional contract theory. Our three key insights are: First, inequity aversion plays a crucial role in the design of optimal contracts. Second, there is a strong tendency towards linear sharing rules, giving a simple and plausible rationale for the prevalence of these schemes in the real world. Third, the Sufficient Statistics result no longer holds as optimal contracts may be ”too” complete. Along with these key insights we derive a couple of further results, e.g. that the First Best contract for risk neutral agents is unique or that for risk neutral agents the First Best is not implementable if effort is not observable. Contracts and Inequity Aversion 2
منابع مشابه
Optimal incentive contracts under inequity aversion
Optimal Incentive Contracts under Inequity Aversion We analyze the Moral Hazard problem, assuming that agents are inequity averse. Our results differ from conventional contract theory and are more in line with empirical findings than standard results. We find: First, inequity aversion alters the structure of optimal contracts. Second, there is a strong tendency towards linear sharing rules. Thi...
متن کاملInequity Aversion , Adverse Selection and Employment Contracts ∗
This paper analyzes the interaction of fairness concerns and social comparisons with asymmetric information and incentives within the context of a firm’s employment decision. It studies optimal, incentive-compatible employment contracts if each worker is inequity averse he suffers from being ‘worse off’ than his colleagues and has private information about his productivity. Inequity aversion is...
متن کاملInequity Aversion and Moral Hazard with Multiple Agents
We analyze how inequity aversion interacts with incentive provision in an otherwise standard moral hazard model with two risk averse agents. We find that behindness aversion (suffering only when being worse off) among agents unambiguously increases agency costs of providing incentives. This holds true if agents also suffer from being better off unless they account for effort costs in their comp...
متن کاملJoint Contract under Inequity Aversion
The standard contract theory adopts the traditional hypothesis of pure self-interest. However, a series of game experiments have proven that people are not any self-interest but also inequity averse. Then, how will the inequity aversion influence the optimal contract for multiple agents? This paper attempts to obtain new theoretical insights by incorporating inequity aversion into the standard ...
متن کاملEfficiency in Team Production with Inequity Averse Agents
This paper analyzes how incentive provision in team production is affected if agents are inequity averse in the sense of Fehr and Schmidt (1999). By deriving optimal contracts accounting for inequity aversion we find that efficient effort choices can be implemented with simple budget-balancing sharing rules if agents are sufficiently inequity averse. Conditions on inequity aversion become less ...
متن کامل